简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Resumo:Google was punished again by European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager.
Google was fined $1.7 billion by the European Union for its third breach of EU antitrust rules in three years.European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager said the latest fine was for “illegal practices in search advertising brokering to cement its dominant market position.”Google's EU fines since 2017 now total $9.4 billion.Google has been punished with a third fine by the European Union in three years.The Alphabet-owned company was fined €1.49 billion, or $1.7 billion, on Wednesday by European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager over what she said were anticompetitive practices related to its AdSense advertising service.Vestager announced the fine in a tweet. She said Google was being punished for “illegal practices in search advertising brokering to cement its dominant market position.” She added: “They shouldn't do that — it denied consumers choice, innovative products, and fair prices.”Specifically, Vestager's team concluded that third-party websites with Google-powered search tools, such as newspapers and travel sites, had “restrictive clauses in contracts” preventing them hosting adverts from rival search engines within their search results, according to a press release.The European Commission published this infographic showing how ads were displayed in the search function of third-party websites:The commissioner reviewed hundreds of contracts dating back to 2006 which included these clauses. Google, it said, started phasing out the exclusivity arrangements in 2009 and replacing them with “premium placement” clauses, which reserved the most profitable spaces in search results for Google ads.Read more: Google will let Android users choose a rival browser to avoid further wrath from the EUIn the same year, Google started including clauses requiring websites to ask Google for written approval before making any changes to the way rival adverts were displayed, right down to their size and colour.Google stopped making these demands in 2016, months after the European Commission issued it with a statement of objections.The $1.7 billion penalty follows Google's record $5 billion fine in July last year for abusing the dominance of Android. The search giant was also fined $2.7 billion in September 2017 over its shopping service. Its fines since 2017 now total $9.4 billion, although Google is appealing both previous fines.The latest penalty equates to 1.29% of Google's turnover in 2018 and the European Commission said it “takes account of the duration and gravity of the infringement.” Vestager added:“Google has cemented its dominance in online search adverts and shielded itself from competitive pressure by imposing anti-competitive contractual restrictions on third-party websites.”This is illegal under EU antitrust rules. The misconduct lasted over 10 years and denied other companies the possibility to compete on the merits and to innovate — and consumers the benefits of competition.“Business Insider has contacted Google for comment. In a statement to CNBC, Google's SVP of global affairs, Kent Walker, said: ”We've always agreed that healthy, thriving markets are in everyone's interest. We've already made a wide range of changes to our products to address the Commission's concerns. Over the next few months, we'll be making further updates to give more visibility to rivals in Europe.“During a press conference on Wednesday, Vestager said the European Commission would continue to monitor Google's behaviour in the marketplace — in particular, she mentioned jobs and local search markets — but praised it for ”stepping up its effort to comply with previous rulings.
Isenção de responsabilidade:
Os pontos de vista expressos neste artigo representam a opinião pessoal do autor e não constituem conselhos de investimento da plataforma. A plataforma não garante a veracidade, completude ou actualidade da informação contida neste artigo e não é responsável por quaisquer perdas resultantes da utilização ou confiança na informação contida neste artigo.